EN
TR
EN
Login
Subscribe
Login
Subscribe
Literature
Derlemeler
Last search result
§ 14. The Relevance of Psychology in Restoring Arbitration Procedural Efficiency
Chapters
Content
Copy citation
Go to
:
Go to
Go to page
Favorites
Display setting:
A⇡
Enlarge font
ᴀ⇣
Reduce font
Hide page number
Links
Chapters
I. The Decision-Making Process in Light of Behavioral Sciences: Methodological Considerations
s. 67
A. System 1 and System 2
s. 67
B. The Predictability of Cognitive Errors
s. 70
C. Structure of the Research
s. 72
II. Reasons Underlying “Irrational Arbitrations”
s. 73
A. Emotions
s. 74
B. Self-Serving Bias, Over-Confidence and Over-Optimism
s. 75
C. Selective Perception and Confirmation Bias
s. 78
D. Debiasing Techniques and the Role of the Arbitral Tribunal
s. 80
III. Reasons Underlying “Rational but Inefficient Arbitrations”
s. 83
A. Reasons Underlying the Excess of Procedural Requests: Parties’ Perspective
s. 85
B. Reasons Underlying the Excess of Procedural Requests: Arbitrators’ Perspective
s. 88
C. Debiasing Techniques and the Role of the Arbitral Tribunal
s. 93
Bottom Search Toolbar Highlight Text
Loading...
TR
EN
