Literatür

§ 14. The Relevance of Psychology in Restoring Arbitration Procedural Efficiency

Git: Git
Favorilere ekle veya çıkar

İçindekiler

I. The Decision-Making Process in Light of Behavioral Sciences: Methodological Considerations

s. 67

A. System 1 and System 2

s. 67

B. The Predictability of Cognitive Errors

s. 70

C. Structure of the Research

s. 72

II. Reasons Underlying “Irrational Arbitrations”

s. 73

A. Emotions

s. 74

B. Self-Serving Bias, Over-Confidence and Over-Optimism

s. 75

C. Selective Perception and Confirmation Bias

s. 78

D. Debiasing Techniques and the Role of the Arbitral Tribunal

s. 80

III. Reasons Underlying “Rational but Inefficient Arbitrations”

s. 83

A. Reasons Underlying the Excess of Procedural Requests: Parties’ Perspective

s. 85

B. Reasons Underlying the Excess of Procedural Requests: Arbitrators’ Perspective

s. 88

C. Debiasing Techniques and the Role of the Arbitral Tribunal

s. 93