Sayfa 1209BIBLIOGRAPHY
Blumberg, Philip I.: “The Corporate Entity in an Era of Multinational Corporations”, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 1990, Vol. 15, No. 2, s. 285-375.
Carrol, Robyn: Corporate Parents and Tort Liability” in Michael Gillooly (ed), The Law Relating to Corporate Groups, Sydney 1993.
Cheng, Thomas K.: “The Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study of the English and the U.S. Corporate Veil Doctrines”, Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 2011, Vol. 34, No. 2, s. 329-412.
Eroglu, Muzaffer: Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities An Interdisciplinary and Comparative Examination, 1st edn., Cheltenham, Northampton, 2008.
Graham, Toby and Poole, Joanna: “Switching Assets from One Shadowy Hand to Another: Piercing the Veil of Company and Trust” Trust & Trustees 2010, Vol. 16, No. 9, s. 705-725.
Griffin, Stephen: “Limited liability: a necessary revolution?”, The Company Lawyer 2004, Vol. 25, No. 4, s. 99-101.
Hansmann, Henry/Kraakman, Reinier: “The Essential Role of Organizational Law”, The Yale Law Journal 2000, Vol. 110, No. 3, s. 387-440.
Hansmann, Henry/Kraakman Reinier: “Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts”, The Yale Law Journal 1991, Vol. 100, No. 7, s. 1879-1934.
Hopt, Klaus J: “Groups of Companies: A Comparative Study of the Economics, Law, and Regulation of Corporate Groups” in Jeffrey N. Gordon and Wolf-Georg Ringe (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance, 1st edn, Oxford, 2018.
Landers, Jonathan M.: “A Unified Approach to Parent, Subsidiary, and Affiliate Questions in Bankruptcy”, The University of Chicago Law Review 1975, Vol. 42, No. 4, s. 589-652.
Lipton, Philip Abraham: The Development of the Separate Legal Entity and Limited Liability Concepts in Company Law An Evolutionary Perspective, 2017, Thesis, Monash University.
Sayfa 1210
Mandaraka-Sheppard, Aleka: “New Trends in Piercing the Corporate Veil: The Conservative Versus the Liberal Approaches”, Business Law Review 2014, Vol. 35, No. 1, s. 2-14.
Martin, Petrin: “Assumption of Responsibility in Corporate Groups: Chandler v Cape Plc.” The Modern Law Review 2013, Vol. 76, No. 3, s. 603-619.
Millon, David K.: “Piercing the Corporate Veil, Financial Responsibility, and the Limits of Limited Liability”, Emory Law Journal 2007, Vol. 56, No. 5, s. 1305-1382.
Muchlinski, Peter: “Limited liability and multinational enterprises: a case for reform?”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, Vol. 34, No. 5, s. 915-923.
Nyombi, Chrispas: “Lifting the Veil of Incorporation under Common Law and Statute”, International Journal of Law and Management 2014, Vol. 56, No. 1, s. 66-81.
Payne, Jennifer: “Lifting the Corporate Veil: A Reassessment of the Fraud Exception”, The Cambridge Law Journal 1997, Vol. 56, No. 2, s. 284-290.
Presser, Stephen B.: “Thwarting the Killing of the Corporation: Limited Liability, Democracy, and Economics Commentary”, Northwestern University Law Review 1992, Vol. 87, s. 148-179.
Rands, William J.: “Domination of a Subsidiary by a Parent”, Ind. L. Rev. 1999, Vol. 32, No. 2, s. 421-456.
The Company Law Review Steering Group, Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy Final Report (DTI, London 2001).
‘Lifting of the Veil Principle.» Chege Kibathi & Co. Advocates’ (Chege Kibathi & Co. Advocates, 5 October 2013)
CASES
Adams v Cape Industries Plc. [1990] Ch 433.
Caporo Industries Plc. v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605.
Chandler v Cape Plc. [2012] EWCA Civ 525.
Creasy v Breachwood Motors Ltd. [1993] BCLC 480.
Sayfa 1211
D.H.N. Food Distributors Ltd. v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [1976] 1 WLR 852.
Firestone Tyre and Rubber v Lewellin [1957] 1 WLR.
Gilford Motor Co. Ltd. v Horne [1993] Ch 935.
Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442.
Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1969] 1 WLR 1241.
Merchandise Transport and British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB.
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd. and others [2013] UK3C 34.
Re A Company [1985] BCLC 333.
Re FG (Films) [1953] 1 WLR.
Re Southard & Co. Ltd., Templeman LJ [1979] 1 WLR 1198.
Salomon v Salomon Co. Ltd. [1897] AC 22.
Scottish Cooperative Wholesale Society v Meyer [1959] AC 324.
The Gramophone and the Typewriter Ltd. v Stanley [1906] 2 KB 856.
Trustor AB v Smallbone [2001] 3 All ER 987.
Woolfson v Strathcylde RC [1978] SC (HL) 90.
Sayfa 1212
EN
TR
